Introduction

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in education has gained significant attention in recent years. As AI technologies continue to advance, the debate surrounding the role of AI in teaching and learning has become increasingly relevant. This article aims to explore the characteristics and implications of human teachers and AI teachers in education, highlighting their respective strengths and limitations. By examining the existing literature and research, this article seeks to provide insights into the potential benefits and challenges of AI in education and inform instructional design strategies for effective implementation.

Human Teachers: The Role of Experience and Expertise

Human teachers have long been the cornerstone of education, providing guidance, support, and knowledge to students. The role of human teachers extends beyond the mere transmission of information; they serve as mentors, facilitators, and role models for students Kim et al. (2022). Human teachers possess a wealth of experience and expertise in their respective fields, allowing them to provide personalized instruction, adapt to students’ needs, and foster critical thinking skills (Arghode et al., 2018). The human element in teaching enables the establishment of meaningful relationships, empathy, and emotional support, which are crucial for student engagement and motivation (Molenaar, 2022).

Furthermore, human teachers possess the ability to navigate complex social dynamics in the classroom, promoting collaboration, communication, and social-emotional development (Arghode et al., 2018). They can create a supportive and inclusive learning environment that caters to the diverse needs of students (Zhao et al., 2022). Human teachers also play a vital role in assessing students’ progress, providing feedback, and adapting instructional strategies accordingly (Roytek, 2010). Their ability to interpret and respond to non-verbal cues and emotional states allows for nuanced and context-specific interventions (Dignum, 2021).

AI Teachers: The Potential of Personalization and Efficiency

AI teachers, on the other hand, offer unique capabilities that can enhance the educational experience. AI technologies, such as machine learning and natural language processing, have the potential to personalize instruction, adapt to individual learning styles, and provide immediate feedback (Seo et al., 2021). AI teachers can analyze vast amounts of data and identify patterns to tailor instruction to students’ specific needs, promoting individualized learning pathways (Yau et al., 2022). This personalized approach can help address the diverse learning preferences and abilities of students, ensuring that each student receives the support they require (Yau et al., 2022).

Moreover, AI teachers can provide continuous and unbiased assessment, reducing the potential for human bias and subjectivity in grading (Haefner et al., 2021). Through automated grading systems, AI teachers can provide timely feedback, allowing students to track their progress and make improvements (Huang, 2018). AI teachers can also offer adaptive learning experiences, adjusting the difficulty level and pace of instruction based on students’ performance and mastery of concepts (Chiu & Chai, 2020). This adaptability can optimize learning outcomes and promote student engagement and motivation (Cukurova et al., 2019).

Challenges and Considerations

While both human teachers and AI teachers offer unique strengths, it is essential to consider the challenges and limitations associated with each. Human teachers may face constraints such as limited time, resources, and expertise in certain subject areas (Arghode et al., 2018). Additionally, the effectiveness of human teachers can vary depending on their pedagogical approaches, instructional design, and professional development opportunities (Halupa, 2019). The quality of education provided by human teachers can be influenced by factors such as class size, workload, and teacher-student ratios (Ng et al., 2023).

AI teachers, on the other hand, face challenges related to the interpretability and explainability of their decision-making processes (Holmes et al., 2021). The lack of transparency in AI algorithms can raise concerns regarding bias, privacy, and ethical considerations (Dignum, 2021). Additionally, AI teachers may struggle to understand and respond to complex emotions, non-verbal cues, and social dynamics in the classroom (Molenaar, 2022). The reliance on AI teachers may also raise questions about the potential devaluation of human expertise and the loss of human connection in the learning process (Williams et al., 2021).

Instructional Design Strategies for Human-AI Collaboration

To harness the benefits of both human teachers and AI teachers, instructional design strategies that promote effective collaboration between humans and AI are crucial. One approach is to adopt a hybrid intelligence model, where human and AI teachers work together to complement each other’s strengths (Molenaar, 2022). This model emphasizes the importance of human oversight, ethical considerations, and the integration of AI technologies as tools to enhance teaching and learning (Molenaar, 2022).

Instructional designers can play a pivotal role in designing learning experiences that leverage the strengths of both human and AI teachers. They can collaborate with human teachers to identify areas where AI technologies can enhance instruction, such as personalized learning, adaptive feedback, and data-driven insights (Halupa, 2019). Instructional designers can also support human teachers in developing the necessary skills and knowledge to effectively integrate AI technologies into their teaching practice (Chiu & Chai, 2020).

Furthermore, instructional designers can ensure the transparency and explainability of AI algorithms, addressing concerns related to bias, privacy, and ethical considerations (Holmes et al., 2021). They can design AI systems that provide clear explanations and justifications for their decisions, allowing students and teachers to understand the reasoning behind AI-generated feedback and recommendations (Cukurova et al., 2019). Additionally, instructional designers can promote the development of AI literacy among teachers, empowering them to critically evaluate and utilize AI technologies in education (Zhao et al., 2022).

Conclusion

The integration of AI in education presents both opportunities and challenges. Human teachers bring invaluable experience, expertise, and the ability to foster meaningful relationships with students. AI teachers offer the potential for personalized instruction, adaptive feedback, and efficient assessment. By leveraging the strengths of both human and AI teachers, instructional designers can create learning experiences that optimize student engagement, motivation, and learning outcomes.

It is crucial to approach the integration of AI in education with careful consideration of ethical, privacy, and equity concerns. The collaboration between human and AI teachers should be guided by a human-centered approach, prioritizing the well-being and development of students. As AI technologies continue to evolve, ongoing research, professional development, and collaboration between educators, researchers, policymakers, and stakeholders are essential to ensure the responsible and effective use of AI in education.

Summary Table

Characteristic Human Teacher AI Teacher
Primary Role Mentor, facilitator, role model Personalized instruction and adaptive feedback provider
Knowledge & Experience Derived from years of training, education, and real-world experiences Based on vast datasets and computational analysis
Adaptive Abilities Can adjust teaching methods based on student feedback, classroom dynamics, and intuition Adjusts automatically based on student performance data and preset algorithms
Emotional Connection Can form deep emotional connections, understand individual student needs, and provide emotional support Limited to data-driven interactions; lacks human empathy
Social Facilitation Facilitates social interactions, group activities, and teamwork, understands classroom dynamics Primarily individual-focused; limited understanding of intricate social dynamics
Assessment Abilities Uses a combination of subjective judgment and objective measures, adjusts based on personal observation Provides consistent, immediate, and data-driven assessments, often without human biases
Inclusivity Can create an environment that caters to diverse student needs through personal interactions Provides personalized learning pathways based on individual data, potentially enhancing inclusivity
Understanding Non-Verbals Can interpret nuances, non-verbal cues, body language, and tone of voice Struggles with complex emotions and non-verbal signals, relies on explicit inputs
Challenges & Limitations Time constraints, workload, limited resources, and potential biases Lack of transparency, potential algorithmic biases, inability to understand complex human emotions
Feedback Mechanism Feedback may be less frequent but is nuanced and holistic, includes both academic and behavioral aspects Offers continuous and immediate feedback based on specific criteria; may lack holistic perspective
Pedagogical Approach Varies based on teaching philosophy, training, and personal experience Driven by data and algorithms, with potential for high personalization but may lack a human touch
Ethical & Privacy Concerns Must consider student privacy, ethical pedagogical decisions, and classroom management Raises issues related to data privacy, algorithmic transparency, and potential over-reliance on technology
Interactivity Engages with students in real-time, encourages discussions, debates, and open questions Provides interactive lessons, quizzes, and feedback, but may lack depth in open-ended discussions
Cultural Sensitivity Can adjust teaching based on cultural awareness and sensitivity to diverse student backgrounds Requires pre-programmed cultural data; may lack nuance in understanding individual cultural nuances
Lifelong Learning Engages in professional development, learns from experiences, and evolves teaching practices over time Continuously updated based on new data, but might not “learn” in the human sense of the word
Collaboration Potential Can collaborate with peers, experts, and students in a dynamic and fluid manner Can be integrated with other systems and platforms for a seamless tech-driven educational experience

References:

  1. Kim, J., Lee, H., & Cho, Y. M. (2022). Learning design to support student-ai collaboration: perspectives of leading teachers for ai in education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 6069-6104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10831-6
  2. Arghode, V., Brieger, E., & Wang, J. (2018). Engaging instructional design and instructor role in online learning environment. European Journal of Training and Development, 42(7/8), 366-380. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejtd-12-2017-0110
  3. Molenaar, I. (2022). Towards hybrid human‐ai learning technologies. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 632-645. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12527
  4. Zhao, L., Wu, X., & Luo, H. (2022). Developing ai literacy for primary and middle school teachers in china: based on a structural equation modeling analysis. Sustainability, 14(21), 14549. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114549
  5. Roytek, M. A. (2010). Enhancing instructional design efficiency: methodologies employed by instructional designers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 170-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00902.x
  6. Dignum, V. (2021). The role and challenges of education for responsible ai. London Review of Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.14324/lre.19.1.01
  7. Seo, K., Tang, J., Roll, I., Fels, S., & Yoon, D. (2021). The impact of artificial intelligence on learner–instructor interaction in online learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00292-9
  8. Yau, K. W., Chai, C. Y., Chiu, T. K. F., Meng, H., King, I., & Yam, Y. (2022). A phenomenographic approach on teacher conceptions of teaching artificial intelligence (ai) in k-12 schools. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 1041-1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11161-x
  9. Haefner, N., Wincent, J., Parida, V., & Gassmann, O. (2021). Artificial intelligence and innovation management: a review, framework, and research agenda✰. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120392
  10. Huang, S. (2018). Effects of using artificial intelligence teaching system for environmental education on environmental knowledge and attitude. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91248
  11. Chiu, T. K. F. and Chai, C. S. (2020). Sustainable curriculum planning for artificial intelligence education: a self-determination theory perspective. Sustainability, 12(14), 5568. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145568
  12. Cukurova, M., Kent, C., & Luckin, R. (2019). Artificial intelligence and multimodal data in the service of human decision‐making: a case study in debate tutoring. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3032-3046. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12829
  13. Halupa, C. (2019). Differentiation of roles: instructional designers and faculty in the creation of online courses. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v8n1p55
  14. Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Su, J., Ng, R. C. W., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Teachers’ ai digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 137-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10203-6
  15. Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Santos, O. C., … & Koedinger, K. R. (2021). Ethics of ai in education: towards a community-wide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 504-526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1
  16. Williams, R. M., Kaputsos, S. P., & Breazeal, C. (2021). Teacher perspectives on how to train your robot: a middle school ai and ethics curriculum. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 35(17), 15678-15686. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v35i17.17847